Want the Mets in the International League in 2015? It’s Rochester or Bust

If the Mets want a Triple-A affiliate closer than Las Vegas for the 2015 season, they would be well-advised to make some friends in Rochester in a hurry.

Yesterday, William Ladson reported that the Washington Nationals and the Syracuse Chiefs would extend their working agreement through the 2018 season.

A little history first. Following four years with the Buffalo Bisons from 2009 through 2012, in which the Bisons saw attendance decline, the Bisons sought an affiliation with the closer Toronto Blue Jays. That pushed the Mets west to Las Vegas and the 51s where they signed a two-year player development contract for the 2013 and 2014 seasons. Remember, Player Development Contracts are almost always mutual, both the Major League and the Minor League team must want to be partners with each other. The exception is the 30th team. If the Mets and Las Vegas are the last big league team and the last minor league team without a dance partner at a given level AAA through a-ball, they are forced onto the floor together.

There are five teams in the East Coast(ish) International League with PDCs that expire at the end of 2014: Columbus Clippers (CLE), Durham Bulls (TB), Norfolk Tides (BAL), Pawtucket Red Sox (BOS), Rochester Red Wings (MIN).

1. Columbus, in a new ballpark, is very happy to be affiliated with Cleveland, which is just over two hours away.
2. Norfolk, which booted the Mets in 2006, when team representatives said things like “They took us for granted,” seems unlikely to be interested in returning to life as a Mets affiliate especially with a PDC with the geographically proximate Orioles in place.
3. Pawtucket isn’t leaving the Red Sox for anything.
4. Durham and Tampa have had a productive relationship for 15 years. I’m not sure what would make Durham jump from Tampa to the Mets.

So, if the Mets want to land an affiliation back in the International League for the 2015 season, Rochester is the move. However, two years ago, faced with a Mets franchise looking for a new International League affiliate, Rochester resigned with Minnesota. The Wings were 72-72 in 2012 and 77-67 in 2013.

Will this round be any different?

The other option for the Mets is a more eastern home in the Pacific Coast League. In particular, Nashville is planning on spending $150 in public and private money million on a new ballpark area, with roughly $50 million coming from the Nashville Sounds, a Brewers affiliate at the moment, for the ballpark and associated retail. In August, this was an $80 million project, but it keeps growing.

If the Mets are interested in a new ballpark in the PCL, the Las Vegas ownership group and developer Howard Hughes Corp is interested in a $65 million ballpark in Summerlin and expressed optimism in May that they could make the ballpark happen. There is now some opposition from unions regarding the $88 million project, which means at least someone is paying attention and thinks the plan has a chance to succeed.

So, the choices for the Mets: stay west and target a new ballpark or aim for the Red Wings?

 

The chart after the jump lists each International League franchise and their PDC status, as best as I could determine.

The 2014 International League PDC Scene


Franchise Affiliate PDC Expires Source
Buffalo Bisons Toronto Blue Jays 2016 MLB.com
Charlotte Knights Chicago White Sox 2020 MiLB.com
Columbus Clippers Cleveland Indians 2014 MLB.com
Durham Bulls Tampa Bay Rays 2014 BA
Gwinnett Braves Atlanta Braves Never
Indianapolis Indians Pittsburgh Pirates 2016 Indy Indians
Lehigh Valley IronPigs Philladelphia Philliies 2016 MiLB.com
Louisville Bats Cincinatti Reds 2016 Bats
Norfolk Tides Baltimore Orioles 2014 Tides
Pawtucket Red Sox Boston Red Sox 2014 BA
Rochester Red Wings Minnesota Twins 2014 Wings
Scranton Wilkes-Barre NYY Never Citizen’s Voice
Syracuse Chiefs Washington Nationals 2018 William Ladson
Toledo Mud Hens Detroit Tigers 2016 BA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s