This article may contain affiliate links. For details, visit our Affiliate Disclosure page.
Body piercings have been around for thousands of years, dating back to ancient civilizations. In the past, piercings were mainly used for cultural or spiritual reasons. However, in recent years, body piercings have become more mainstream and a popular form of self-expression. While body piercings are becoming more socially acceptable, it’s essential to consider the method used to pierce the body. One method that is heavily frowned upon in the piercing community is the piercing gun. In this blog post, we will explore why piercing guns are frowned upon and the potential risks associated with using them.
The Problem with Piercing Guns
Piercing guns are a popular method of piercing because they are fast, convenient, and inexpensive. However, these benefits come at a significant cost to the wearer. Piercing guns work by using a spring-loaded gun that forces a stud through the skin. The stud is often made of a low-quality metal that can cause skin irritation, allergic reactions, or even infections. Additionally, the force from the gun can cause tissue damage, leading to complications such as scarring and keloids.
Hygiene Concerns
Another significant problem with piercing guns is the lack of hygiene. Piercing guns cannot be sterilized adequately, meaning that there is a risk of transmitting blood-borne infections such as hepatitis and HIV. The piercing gun is also challenging to clean correctly, making it a breeding ground for bacteria and viruses. This can lead to a range of infections such as staph and MRSA.
Lack of Precision
One of the essential aspects of body piercing is precision. A skilled piercer should be able to place the piercing in the exact location intended. Piercing guns do not allow for this level of precision, and often, the studs are placed incorrectly, leading to discomfort, migration, and even rejection of the piercing. Additionally, piercings done with guns are often not deep enough, leading to a higher risk of the jewelry falling out or becoming embedded in the skin.
Legal and Ethical Concerns
Piercing guns are also frowned upon due to legal and ethical concerns. In many states, it is illegal to use a piercing gun on any part of the body except the earlobes. This is because piercing guns can cause significant damage to the tissue and are not a safe method of piercing. Additionally, the use of piercing guns on non-earlobe piercings is considered unethical because it places the wearer at risk of injury or complications.
Alternative Piercing Methods
While piercing guns may seem like a convenient option, there are several alternative methods of piercing that are safer and more precise. One popular method is the use of a hollow needle. Hollow needles are sterile, and they allow the piercer to be more precise with the placement of the piercing. Additionally, hollow needles are less painful than piercing guns and have a lower risk of complications.
Another popular option is the use of a dermal punch. Dermal punches are a precise and safe method of piercing, allowing the piercer to create a circular incision in the skin. This method of piercing is often used for larger gauge piercings and is less painful than a needle or piercing gun.
Conclusion
In conclusion, piercing guns are heavily frowned upon in the piercing community for several reasons. Piercing guns are associated with several risks, including tissue damage, infections, and legal and ethical concerns. Alternative methods of piercing such as the use of a hollow needle or dermal punch are safer and more precise, making them the preferred method of piercing. It’s essential to choose a reputable piercer who uses safe and sterile equipment to ensure a safe and successful piercing.
